Photo Credit: Will Wysong / Flickr |
Jan 7, 2013 | Alternet | Rand Clifford
The pipeline isn't for oil, it's for a toxic fossil fuel cocktail called “DilBit.”
This article was published in partnership with GlobalPossibilities.org.
The massive exploitation of Alberta tar sands may be the
biggest environmental crime in history and a new benchmark for sacrifice
of public health to corporate profit.
It's so much
more than converting an area of boreal forest the size of England into a
cankerous and lifeless open sore bleeding tar. It's more than
decimating some of the world’s last wild forests—home to 35% of Canada’s
wetlands. And it's more than attacking Earth’s biosphere with a carbon
weapon of mass destruction.
How far has corporate
depravity driven corporate disregard for life on Earth? The exploitation
of the Alberta tar sands goes the distance with the Keystone XL pipeline.
In December 11, 2012 an L.A. Times article
by Molly Hennessy-Fiske revealed that Jack Sinz, Texas County Court at
Law Judge, lifted his restraining order that delayed a portion of
TransCanada’s Keystone XL running through eastern Texas. The restraining
order resulted from landowner Michael Bishop filing suit to halt
pipeline construction on his property because TransCanada fraudulently
promised that Keystone XL would transport “crude oil”.
TransCanada
lawyers convinced Judge Sinz that Michael Bishop “...understood what he
was doing when he signed off on an easement agreement with the company
three weeks ago.”
TransCanada spokesman Shawn Howard
stated: “TransCanada has been open and transparent with Mr. Bishop at
all times.” Then Mr. Howard further illuminates the howler of
TransCanada being open and transparent: “Since Mr. Bishop signed his
agreement with TransCanada, nothing about the pipeline or the product it
will carry has changed. While professional activists and others have
made the same claims Mr. Bishop did today, oil is oil.”
Problem is, oil is exactly what Keystone pipeline does not pipe.
Raw
bitumen diluted with up to 50% natural gas liquids (condensates) at
1,440 pounds per square inch (psi) pressure, and temperature of 160
degrees Fahrenheit—that’s what Keystone XL pipes, a wicked brew called,
“DilBit”.
What's DilBit?
That depends.
TransCanada’s
spokesman, Shawn Howard, said, “...oil is oil”. But that's hardly the
case. The massive exploitation of Alberta tar sands (MEATS) and Keystone
XL advocates cultivate public misconception of DilBit being “crude
oil”. A dangerous ruse spanning pipeline safety regulations to pipeline
technology and leak detection...back to public awareness. Pawning off
DilBit as crude oil is TransCanada’s public-relations Job Number
One—except when it comes to the IRS.
Ad |
Texas,
and federal statutory codes define crude oil as "liquid hydrocarbons
extracted from the earth at atmospheric temperatures”. Simple enough,
DilBit is not crude oil.
Alberta bitumen is strip-mined
and steam-melted from sands and silts; it takes two tons of earth,
three barrels of water, and lots of natural gas to extract one barrel of
raw bitumen , which is almost a solid.
MEATS currently consumes, per day, enough natural gas to heat 3 million Canadian homes, and fouls 400 million gallons of water. Wastewater is pumped into immense tailing ponds rich in arsenic, cyanide, ammonia, cadmium, lead, mercury, nickel, zinc -- not to mention the biocidal gumbo of hydrocarbons -- sixty-five square miles of tailing ponds, so far.
Downstream from tailing ponds, as in Fort Chipewyan, spikes
of lupus, renal failure, hyperthyroidism and 100 of the town’s largely
indigenous population of 1,200 have died of cancer. Many rare cancers.
DilBit’s character really shines its deepest darkest black when spilled into the environment.
Actually,
a cup of coffee might spill, a glass of milk; eruption is a better term
for a DilBit pipeline or pump station, “event”.
Permanent Pollution
Keystone was predicted to spill no more than once every seven years.
After
being in operation less than one year, Keystone tallied its eleventh
spill—at a pump station, which TransCanada insists “don’t count”.
It
was in Ludden, North Dakota, May 7, 2011. A 3/4-inch pipe fitting
failed under the pressure, erupting DilBit sixty feet high—21,000
gallons in minutes.
July 26, 2010 had already shown us
what a DilBit pipeline at 1440 psi and 160 degrees F can do. Line 6B of
the Enbridge Energy Partners Lakehead system ruptured, erupting a
million gallons of DilBit into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River; the“Marshall spill”.
Since
pipeline operators are not required to say what they are piping,
emergency responders didn’t discover until ten days later that what
turned the Kalamazoo River black was DilBit. Original expectations were
that cleanup would take a few months. But after two years the job was
not over and apparently never will be. The EPA has declared thirty miles
of the Kalamazoo River “ essentially permanently polluted”.
Typically, 90% of crude oil spilled into water can be captured with booms and skimmers.
DilBit
is from 50% to 70% bitumen, diluted with natural gas condensates
collectively called diluents (exact composition of diluents is a “trade
secret”). DilBit in the Kalamazoo River was 70% bitumen. After diluents
separated out, bitumen sank and coated the riverbed.
Coincidentally,
nine days before DilBit tarred the Kalamazoo River, the EPA warned that
the “proprietary nature” of DilBit diluents could complicate cleanup.
Over
the last ten years, average cleanup cost of spilled crude oil has been
about $2,000 per barrel; DilBit in the Kalamazoo has cost $29,000 per
barrel, making it by far the most expensive spill in U.S. history—over
$800 million so far. Much of the bitumen cannot be cleaned up without
destroying the riverbed.
DilBit pipelines operate at
elevated temperature and high pressure to reduce viscosity and increase
piping efficiency—increasing the risk of corrosion for a product that,
compared to crude oil, contains huge amounts of abrasive quartz
particles. DilBit’s extreme acidity and sulfur content also weaken
steel.
Between 2002 and 2010, the Alberta
hazardous-liquid pipeline system had twenty-five-times as many leaks and
ruptures per mile than the U. S. system, mostly from internal
corrosion.
TransCanada responded to the corrosion problem by seeking a safety waiver to use thinner-than-normal steel for Keystone XL.
Ad |
Defective Steel
Pipeline
construction saw a major boom from 2007 to 2009. The Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) inspection of seven
pipelines built during the boom revealed that five showed expansion
anomalies indicating significant amounts of defective steel. Several
mills had provided defective steel, but 88% of the pipe with expansion
anomalies was traced to a manufacturer based in India: Welspun Power and
Steel.
Welspun provided 47% of the steel for Keystone 1.
TransCanada confirmed on February 2, 2012, that they will not be using any steel from India to build Keystone XL.
An email
to Energy and Commerce Committee staff from TransCanada’s government
relations staff said: “We have not sourced any steel from India.” But
days later (February 17, 2012), TransCanada confirmed in a press release
that 10% of the steel in Keystone XL will come from Welspun, India.
Other examples of TransCanada’s openness and transparency include:
- December 31, 2009: TransCanada confesses that Keystone XL would cause an increase in gas prices.
- June, 2010: TransCanada cites a recent study that claims Keystone XL would reduce gas prices. From the TransCanada website: “...supplies from reliable sources leads to lower costs, thereby putting downward pressure on prices.”
- September 26, 2011: Alex Pourbaix, TransCanada’s President of Energy and Oil Pipelines declares that the route for Keystone XL has been exhaustively analyzed, and it would be next to impossible to change it now.
- October 11, 2011: In a meeting with Nebraska State Senators, Alex Pourbaix insists that moving the route for Keystone XL would jeopardize the project.
- October 18, 2011: “...it is possible for us to move the route to avoid the Sandhills.” (Alex Pourbaix)
- November 14, 2011: TransCanada announces they will change the route of Keystone XL.
- November 29, 2011: Russ Girling, CEO of TransCanada, declares that re-routing the pipeline would be easy.
- December 2, 2011: Alex Pourbaix cannot promise that Keystone XL’s “crude oil” will not be for foreign export. That’s a very important point. Keystone XL will supply the global market—a pipeline through, not to, the U.S.
Jobs
Massive
corporate attacks on the environment are often heralded by
wildly-inflated promises of jobs, a standard brilliantly reflected by
Keystone XL.
TransCanada purports that Keystone XL construction will create 20,000 American jobs.
Numbers
from independent analysis seem more realistic, freer of agenda,
averaging out to: 50 permanent jobs and 2,500 temporary jobs—but wait a
minute. Considering jobs in emergency-response, cleanup, and
environmental rehabilitation (where possible) created by DilBit erupting
from Keystone XL...20,000 jobs might seem like an underestimation?
Could tar mop-up be a new major growth industry, brought to us by a neighbor we thought was friendly?
Perhaps TransCanada was simply not open and transparent regarding the kind of jobs Keystone XL will create. After all, TransCanada was open and transparent on September 17, 2009, when they described Keystone XL as “...a boon for corporate profits, but a burden to American consumers.”
Tar With Attitude
Ad |
The
“column” is a mass of DilBit up to thirty miles long being squeezed
along like toothpaste. Variations in pipeline pressure cause diluents to
change from liquid to gas, creating a bubble, or column separation
within the pipeline. Collapse of bubbles can result in pressure spikes
capable of deforming or even rupturing pipeline.
Column
separation can also make it very difficult to detect leaks. A bubble
can impede the flow of DilBit to and from nearby pump stations, giving
pipeline operators signs similar to a leak. If the impeded flow is
interpreted as a column separation, more DilBit is forced through the
pipeline—which can be horrific if there is a leak.
Keystone
uses leak-detection technology developed for crude oil pipelines.
294,000 gallons of loss per day is needed to activate automatic safety
responses. In the Marshal spill, the Enbridge pipeline erupted Dilbit
into the Kalamazoo River for over twelve hours before pipeline shutdown.
If
a leak is detected and safety valves block the flow of DilBit, a
potentially devastating phenomenon called a “fluid hammer” can elevate
pressures far above the pipeline’s operating pressure. A column of
DilBit at high pressure is like a freight train 30-miles long—impossible
to stop quickly. Tons of inertia feed a train wreck inside the
pipeline...a fluid hammer.
Yet another unique DilBit
hazard: in a pipeline rupture, diluents can explode—natural gas
condensates so flammable they can even set raw bitumen on fire. Burning
raw bitumen boils up toxic clouds containing a gas lethal in minute
concentrations: hydrogen sulfide.
Emergency personnel
responding to a DilBit pipeline eruption must be fully trained and
equipped to deal with hydrogen sulfide drifting toward populated areas.
The gas is heavier than air, creating severe exposure potential because
it hugs the ground, pooling in hollows, canyons, valleys...populated
areas, generally.
U.S. Best Interests
TransCanada
so rarely tells the truth, when it happens it’s an event—especially
when something as profound as Keystone XL being “...a boon for corporate
profits, but a burden for American consumers” is spilled.
Keystone XL is a pipeline for the blackest goo that ever shined doom in all colors.
$5.2 billion and counting has been spent to extend fossil-fuel dependence -- $5.2 billion that could have funded energies that offer a future.
The whole job-creation scenario wilts in light of the new-energy jobs taken away by pursuing bitumen as an energy source.
How
could a product destined for the global market be spoken of in terms of
U.S. energy security? Besides, even at maximum exploitation, Dilbit
could supply only about 2% of U.S. energy consumption.
Keystone XL’s threat to vital U.S. resources peaks out by crossing nineteen miles of the Ogallala aquifer with zero special precautions.
Latest
polls show battle lines being drawn between disinformation, and
awareness. Disinformation has healthy financial backing. Awareness faces
austerity, if not poverty.
A flash of light: the L.A.
Times’ recent online poll has 25% of respondents saying yes to
construction of Keystone XL, while 75% say no.
Barack
Obama is in the sticky situation of trying to sell a pipeline squeezing
DilBit through the U.S. heartland, to feed the international market, as
somehow in the nation’s best interests. Extreme public risk for nothing
but corporate profits. Or, as TransCanada put it “...a boon for
corporate profits, but a burden for American consumers.”
Keystone XL is a tar baby if ever there was one.
Does the President have the cojones to, at least for the sake of public health, stand up and say no to Big Tar?
Rand Clifford lives in Spokane, Washington. His novels, CASTLING, TIMING, and Priest Lake Cathedral, are published by StarChief Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment