Dec 10, 2013 | RT America
This week Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh challenged the Obama administration's official narrative on the September chemical weapons attack near Damascus, with a report alleging the White House "cherry-picked" intelligence to justify a military strike against Bashar al-Assad's government. Both the New Yorker and the Washington Post rejected Hersh's reported, suggesting that the mainstream media still hasn't learned from the mistakes it made 10 years ago when faulty intelligence was used to go to war in Iraq. RT's Sam Sacks reports.
No comments:
Post a Comment