image |
Mar 10, 2013 | Mark Stopa
I was chatting with a colleague on the phone the other day as I was driving my kids (ages, 9, 8, and 7) to school. We were chatting about HB87, a proposed piece of legislation in Florida that would accelerate the foreclosure process and eradicate the rights of homeowners.
When I hung up, I found myself trying to explain the situation to my kids. It wasn’t easy, but I could do it … from a defense perspective, anyway.
When people buy a house, they usually
borrow money from a bank. If they can’t pay the bank back (because
they lost their job, for example), the bank will try to foreclose and
take their house back. Daddy helps those people try to keep their house
in court. But some of the bankers are trying to pass a law that would
make it easier to take people’s homes away. Daddy is trying to stop
that.
When people buy a house, they usually
borrow money from a bank. If they can’t pay the bank back (because
they lost their job, for example), the bank will try and foreclose and
take the house back. Daddy helps those banks try to foreclose faster
and take the homes sooner. And daddy is trying to help pass a law,
called HB87, to make it easier to take people’s homes away.
Look, I get that I’m biased here. But I
really wonder how anyone on the banks’ side of this would try to explain
this to their children. My point?
If you can’t explain what you’re doing to a child, what you’re doing probably isn’t right.
No comments:
Post a Comment