The Fracked-up USA Shale Gas Bubble
Mar 13 2013 | Global Research | F. William Engdahl
At a time when much of the world is
looking with a mix of envy and excitement at the recent boom in USA
unconventional gas from shale rock, when countries from China to Poland
to France to the UK are beginning to launch their own ventures into
unconventional shale gas extraction, hoping it is the cure for their
energy woes, the US shale boom is revealing itself to have been a
gigantic hyped confidence bubble that is already beginning to deflate.
Carpe diem!
America: The New Saudi Arabia?
If we’re to believe the current media
reports out of Washington and the US oil and gas industry, the United
States is about to become the “new Saudi Arabia.” We are told she is
suddenly and miraculously on the track to energy self-sufficiency. No
longer need the US economy depend on high-risk oil or gas from the
politically unstable Middle East or African countries. The Obama White
House energy adviser, Heather Zichal, has even shifted her focus from
pushing carbon cap ‘n trade schemes to promoting America’s “shale
revolution.”[1]
In his January 2012 State of the Union
Address to Congress, President Obama claimed that, largely owing to the
shale gas revolution, “We have a supply of natural gas that can last
America nearly 100 years.” [2]
Renowned energy experts like Cambridge
Energy Research’s Daniel Yergin in recent Congressional testimony waxed
almost poetic about the purported benefits of the recent US shale oil
and gas exploitation: “The United States is in the midst of the
‘unconventional revolution in oil and gas’ that, it becomes increasingly
apparent, goes beyond energy itself.” He didn’t explain what exactly
energy going beyond energy itself means. He also claimed that “the
industry supports 1.7 million jobs – a considerable accomplishment given
the relative newness of the technology. That number could rise to 3
million by 2020.”[3] Very impressive numbers.
Mr Yergin went on to suggest a major
geopolitical dimension of America’s shale oil and gas industry, saying
“expansion of US energy exports will add an additional dimension to US
influence in the world…Shale gas has risen from two percent of domestic
production a decade ago to 37 percent of supply, and prices have dropped
dramatically. US oil output, instead of continuing its long decline,
has increased dramatically – by about 38 percent since 2008. Just the
increase since 2008 is equivalent to the entire output of Nigeria, the
seventh-largest producing country in OPEC…People talk about the
potential geopolitical impact of the shale gas and tight oil. That
impact is already here…”[4]
In their Energy Outlook to 2030,
published in 2012, BP’s CEO Bob Dudley sounded a similar upbeat
projection of the role of shale gas and oil in making North America
energy independent of the Middle East. BP predicted that growth in shale
oil and gas supplies—“along with other fuel sources”—will make the
western hemisphere virtually self-sufficient in energy by 2030. In a
development with enormous geopolitical implications, a large swath of
the world including North and South America would see its dependence on
oil imports from potentially volatile countries in the Middle East and
elsewhere disappear, BP added.[5]
There’s only one thing wrong with all
the predictions of a revitalized United States energy superpower
flooding the world with its shale oil and shale gas. It’s based on a
bubble, on hype from the usual Wall Street spin doctors. In reality it
is becoming increasingly clear that the shale revolution is a short-term
flash in the energy pan, a new Ponzi fraud, carefully built with the
aid of the same Wall Street banks and their “market analyst” friends,
many of whom brought us the 2000 “dot.com” bubble and, more
spectacularly, the 2002-2007 US real estate securitization bubble.[6] A more careful look at the actual performance of the shale revolution and its true costs is instructive.
Read complete essay..
No comments:
Post a Comment