Showing posts with label CAFOs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CAFOs. Show all posts

Monday, December 22, 2014

Spy drones expose factory farming's disgusting environmental devastation they don't want us to know about

© Natural News
Natural News | Dec 20, 2014 | Kali Sinclair

We've known the horrific conditions animals endure when raised in factory farms. One could only hope we have all seen some footage that shows chickens, cows, or pigs crammed into tiny spaces so filled that the animals cannot turn around or lay down. One thing we haven't seen until now are the cesspools created by factory farming.

Mark Devries, director of the documentary Speciesism, the Movie, explores the cultural belief that "our species is more important than the rest." His exposure of factory farming as "one of the greatest evils in our history" should give us pause. After all, animal cruelty laws are widely upheld when it comes to the treatment of cats, dogs, and horses. For some reason they don't apply to factory raised animals.

Factory farms are tucked away and hidden from prying eyes. In his film, Mark crawls through bushes, flies over factory farms, and even uses a drone to videotape the landscape. In a clip (see video below) his drone reveals a cesspool the size of three football fields. The cesspool is simply a giant trench filled to the brim with pig feces and urine. The metal buildings beside the cesspool hold pigs crammed nose to tail. Waste is flushed under each building to the cesspools and then sprayed into the air.

Now here's the interesting part. The animal waste is not pumped into a treatment facility. It is not pumped into a septic tank. It is not treated in any way. It is sprayed into the air.

From there, where does it go? While giant factory farms make an effort to hide away in rural settings, they still have neighbors. Their practice of spraying waste into the air causes it to drift onto their neighbors' property. The odor alone is unimaginable. At times, it rain animal feces onto the neighbors' yards and houses. Asthma rates, especially for children, are high. Runoff from factory farms contaminates waterways and groundwater.

Animals raised under these conditions are highly susceptible to disease. Initial reports regarding the Swine flu epidemic identified patient zero as a child who lived near a factory farm, but these reports were quickly squashed.


If you need a more reasons to stay away from factory farmed meat, check out, Food for Naught.

Sources:

http://speciesismthemovie.com

http://factoryfarmdrones.com

About the author:
Kali Sinclair is a copywriter for Green Lifestyle Market, and a lead editor for Organic Lifestyle Magazine. Kali was very sick with autoimmune disease and realized that conventional medicine was not working for her. She has been restoring her health by natural means and is interested in topics including natural health, environmental issues, and human rights.

Saturday, December 13, 2014

With Help From USDA, Factory Farms 'Masquerading' Products as Organic

This flyover shot taken during Cornucopia Institute's investigation
shows Herbruck’s farm in Saranac, Michigan, which holds 85,000
hens per building and none outdoors. (Photo: Cornucopia Institute)
Common Dreams | Dec 11, 2014 | Nadia Prupis

Cornucopia Institute sues 14 industrial farms over alleged fraud, mistreatment of animals

More than a dozen factory farms producing dairy and meat products for stores nationwide engaged in widespread organic fraud for years as the USDA stood idly by, an agriculture industry watchdog said on Thursday.

A months-long investigation by the Cornucopia Institute discovered that 14 farms around the country producing so-called organic products have been defying USDA regulations, keeping animals tightly packed in facilities with no real access to the outdoors, while federal management routinely ignored pressure to investigate conditions.

The institute filed suit against those farms on Thursday and called on the USDA to remove the industry management body, the National Organic Program.

Organic fraud is "unconscionable," said Mark A. Kastel, Cornucopia senior farm policy analyst. "The job of the USDA is to oversee the certifiers and ensure that they are doing their job. It is quite possible that, in this case, there could have been a conspiracy and/or negligence that the certifier was responsible for."

After what the Cornucopia Institute called "years of inaction" by the USDA, the watchdog group conducted an independent investigation into the conditions of a number of farms currently creating products for labels that market themselves as humane, environmentally conscious, and economically fair.

None of them passed muster.

Current organic rules dictate that animals designated as organic must have their "health and natural behavior" accommodated, allowing cows to graze and chickens to roam. Among the farms named in Cornucopia Institute's lawsuit is Horizon Dairy, a grocery store staple that depicts a happy, animated cow as its logo; but aerial photographs taken during Cornucopia's investigation show that Horizon farms, as well as the "vast majority" of large-scale farms that label themselves organic, "had 100% of their animals confined in giant buildings or feedlots," conditions which violate federal standards for organic farms, the institute says.

Other well-known brands whose dairies failed to measure up in Cornucopia's investigation were Herbruck's and Organic Valley.

"The federal organic regulations make it very clear that all organic livestock must have access to the outdoors and that ruminants, like dairy cows, must have access to pasture," Kastel said.

With the organic industry expanding in response to increased desire for more natural products and humane treatment of animals, consumers are likely to feel deceived to learn of the real conditions on those farms, Kastel added. "Shoppers, who passionately support the ideals and values represented by the organic label, understandably feel betrayed when they see photos of these massive CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations) masquerading as organic."

This is not the first time that Horizon, or other brands named in the suit, have been in trouble for skirting regulations. Some of its largest dairy providers are still being investigated by the USDA for "improprieties."

But federal oversight is still inadequate, often taking years to respond to complaints and review appeals from dairies that continue operating illegally in the interim, Cornucopia says—actions which diminish profits for legitimate farms nearby.

"The inaction by the USDA places thousands of ethical family-scale farmers, who are competing with a couple of dozen giant dairies, at a competitive disadvantage,” said Kevin Engelbert, an organic dairy farmer and former member of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), a citizen advisory panel. "Allowing these illegal dairies to continue to operate is a travesty and significantly undercuts the supply-demand dynamic that should be rewarding farmers in the marketplace and providing a decent living for our families."

The criticism against the USDA does not stop at inaction against illegal operators. The agency also restricted the oversight responsibilities of the NOSB and weakened rules for the use of synthetic ingredients in organic food production, Cornucopia says.

Many of those farms are denying that any impropriety exists. "A single photo doesn’t really tell us anything about a farm and its practices," Sonja Tuitele, a spokesperson for Aurora Organic Dairy, told the Washington Post. "Our records do indicate that all of our lactating cows at the Coldwater facility were grazing on pastures on May 17th. Since we don’t know what time of day this photo was taken, we can only assume this photo was taken outside of their daily grazing hours."

Jay Feldman, executive director of Beyond Pesticides and member of the NOSB, called the current situation "untenable."

He added, "Someone needs to take responsibility for the divide in this industry which has begun seriously undercutting the credibility of the organic label and the livelihoods of ethical organic farmers."

Thursday, August 14, 2014

CAFO Lots: Are We Allowed to See How Our Food Is Raised?

TruthStream News | Aug 14, 2014

In this special investigative report, Aaron and Melissa drive straight into modern dust bowl conditions to visit a CAFO (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation) in North Texas to see first hand how the food supply is raised.



In sometimes harrowing footage, they witness the compact conditions in which thousands upon thousands of cattle are raised to provide cheap meat to the population. Surrounded by literal mountains of dung buried under tires and miles of less-than-serene landscape, these cattle, like millions of others in America, are fattened on taxpayer subsidized GMO corn and grown bigger with the help of antibiotics and hormones. Worse, these concentrated conditions are said to be a breeding ground for disease, and a major source of polluted runoff with major impact upon the environment.

Is this food ethical to eat? The answer to that question remains up to you...

Monday, March 17, 2014

Livestock Mistreated with GMO Feed

Project Censored | Mar 14, 2014 |

Animal rights activists addressing the abuses of CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) often focus on the more obvious ways animals are distressed. Yet some researchers point to a less-understood aspect of livestock mistreatment: force-fed monoculture diets of genetically modified corn and soy that is often drenched in the chemical glyphosate, the Monsanto Corporation’s key chemical commodity.

As a result of this nutritional regime calves are born with enlarged joints and limb deformities, inhibiting their mobility. Piglets have such rapidly deteriorating health that they start breaking down their own tissues and organs – essentially self-cannibalizing—to continue living. Many animals suffer from fragile bones that easily crack. Dairy cows develop mastitis, a painful udder infection. Beef cattle develop liver abscesses and a severe condition called “twisted gut.”

These are the observations of Dr. Art Dunham, an Iowa veterinarian. Dunham’s daughter, Leah Dunham, used her father’s notes to write America’s Two-Headed Pig. In it she argues that animal misery might be more readily addressed through a non-GMO diet versus the broader project of overhauling the entire CAFO-based system.

Their findings are especially prescient since the symptoms observed in animals often resemble many of the chronic, and increasingly prevalent, health problems afflicting humans today: Gastrointestinal disorders, ravaged organs, infertility, declining immune systems, and lingering depression.

Many consumers are alarmed by news reports highlighting outbreaks of food-borne illnesses. Yet most are also unaware that industrial GMO crops are “damaging our health in other, far more insidious ways – among them, by damaging the health of animals raised for food,” Leah Dunham contends.

Source: Katherine Paul, “Torturing Animals with GMOs.” CounterPunch, August 9, 2013, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/08/09/torturing-animals-with-gmos/.

Student Researcher: Nicholas Saraceno (Florida Atlantic University)

Faculty Evaluator: James F. Tracy (Florida Atlantic University)

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Corporate Fail: Disney's Attempt to Trademark Cultural Holiday

Cartoon by Lalo
Alcaraz/Pocho.com
Corporate Fail: Disney's Attempt to Trademark Cultural Holiday
May 7, 2013 | Common Dreams | Andrea Germanos

Disney drops efforts to trademark 'Día de los Muertos' following online outrage

Disney has dropped its effort to trademark 'Día de los Muertos,' a holiday celebrated in Mexico and around the world, following widespread outrage.

 Fronteras Desk reported that
Disney filed 10 requests in the U.S. Trademark and Patent Office this month to coin the phrase. Disney's filings are mainly for merchandise, presumably connected to an upcoming film.

The areas they are hoping to secure include “education and entertainment services,” “fruit preserves; fruit-based snack foods,” “toys, games and playthings,” “clothing,” “footwear,” “backpacks,” “clocks and jewelry” and more.
Online outraged followed the news that the corporation would appropriate and profit from a cultural tradition.

A Change.org petition launched following the announcement states:
Dia de los Muertos is a religious observance during which Mexican people, and particularly native peoples, in Mexico, the United States, and abroad, honor ancestors and loved ones who have died. This important religious, spiritual, and cultural observance pre-dates the invasion of Mexico by the Spanish. We celebrate these sacred days and honor our deceased loved ones by making altars and placing offerings of food such as pan de muertos baked in shapes of skulls and figures, candles, incense, yellow marigolds known as cempaxochitl, and offering prayers and the smoke of copal. Disney's proposed trademarks would negatively affect the livelihood of bakers, the work of artists and craftspeople, and of writers and educators.
Our spiritual traditions are for everyone, not for companies like Walt Disney to trademark and exploit. I am deeply offended and dismayed that a family-oriented company like Walt Disney would seek own the rights to something that is the rightful heritage of the people of Mexico.
But just a week after submitting its trademark requests, Disney said it was dropping those efforts, stating:
Disney's trademark filing was intended to protect any potential title for our film and related activities. It has since been determined that the title of the film will change, and therefore we are withdrawing our trademark filing.
As On the Commons, a movement working for a commons-based society has documented, Disney has been 'raiding the commons' for decades, taking from the public domain but offering nothing back in return.